Graph dataset
Citation + retraction integrity graph
Three tables with stable IDs: papers, citations, and one row per (paper, source) retraction assertion with a source tier. Enough to rebuild the citation neighbourhood of a retracted paper offline, or to audit how a judgment was reached.
- Papers (nodes)
- 98,868
- Citation edges
- 144,814
- Retraction status rows
- 572
- Snapshot
- ri-20261025-1526
Sources: OpenAlex works and references, Crossref update-to relations, Retraction Watch (reason and nature free text excluded).
CC0-1.0Free to download
Hugging Face →Judgment API
Retraction propagation judgment
Give it a DOI, get back whether its claims rest on retracted work: verdict (CLEAR / CONTESTED / …), confidence with its basis, reference coverage, retracted roots with depth and per-source agreement, conflict flags, and evidence-path length. No model in the loop, so two calls with the same snapshot agree.
- Output
- verdict + confidence
- Per call
- deterministic, 0 LLM tokens
- Evidence
- retracted roots, depth, agreement
Sources: Same snapshot as the graph dataset.
CC0-1.0 data, hosted judgment$0.02 per call
GitHub →Synthetic corpus
Synthetic smart-contract security relations
A worked example of what a curated “data with judgments” delivery looks like: source-grounded JSONL, a PostgreSQL load script, and a Markdown corpus you can index with the GraphRAG MCP server. Use it to evaluate the pipeline without touching your own documents.
- Entities
- 11
- Relations
- 13
- Source excerpts
- 5
- Evaluation questions
- 5
Sources: Original fictional audit corpus shipped with graphrag-ts. Every contract, dependency and incident is invented.
MIT$0.02 local / $0.10 global query
Source →